Kame'eiamoku

PRESS RELEASE 

For immediate release: September 17, 2013

Contact: Maltbie Napoleon

maltbiek@gmail.com

The reporting of war crimes is authorized by Section 495(a), U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10, whereby the remedial action of "Publication of the facts, with a view to influencing public opinion against the offending [individuals]" is legally authorized under the laws of occupation. The Ohana Napoleon, https://sites.google.com/site/ohananapoleon/, website will be periodically updated by publicly identifying individuals, whether government or civilian, who committed a war crime and were reported to the United Nations Human Rights Council, Geneva, Switzerland.

On August 22, 2013, War Crime Complaints were sent to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and copies received on September 3, 2013, to the United Nations Human Rights Commission and Dr. Keanu Sai, Acting Council of Regency, Hawaiian Kingdom by Maltbie Kame’eiamoku Napoleon, a Hawaiian subject and protected person under the 1949 Geneva Convention IV. On September17, 2013, the ICC responded to the receipt of my complaints, OTP-CR-283/13.

The War Crime Complaint alleges:

Pursuant to the Rome Statute’s Article 8 – War Crimes, (1) The Court shall have jurisdiction in respect of war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes.

State of Hawaii Judges, RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, committed a war crime by willfully depriving me, Maltbie Kameiamoku Napoleon, a protected person, of a fair and regular trial prescribed by the fourth Geneva Convention.  As a further perpetrator, HOVEY B. LAMBERT, TRUSTEE, Attorney’s PHILIP J. LEAJ, LORI K. AMANO, HENRY F. BEERMAN, Attorney for Patricia Chinn, State of Hawai‘i Governor NEAL ABERCROMBIE, represented by the State of Hawai‘i Attorney General DAVID M. LOUIE, HAWAII RESERVES, INC. aka. PROPERTY RESERVE, INC., President, ERIK H. BEAVER, agent for CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, hereinafter, DEFENDANT’S, were complicit in these proceedings and therefore committed a war crime as accessories.

On or about September 1, 2010, I was notified by public advertisement of partition proceedings instituted by PHILIP J. LEAS, W. KEONI SHULTZ and LORI K. AMANO, Attorney’s for Plaintiff, HOVEY B. LAMBERT, trustee under the Hovey B. Lambert Trust, an unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 5, 2002, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, Island of Oahu, Civil No. 09-1-2529-10, before Judge RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, (Partition). As a Hawaiian subject, third-party beneficiary under the Lili’uokalani assignment, I have a vested undivided 1/3 interest in this property.

Statement:

I was notified by public advertisement and entered the case pro se. In this case, I have provided argument and supporting evidence on the facts, that, Hawaii continues to be an independent State illegally occupied by the United States. Since there is no treaty of annexation between Hawai‘i and the United States, Congressional law can have no force and effect beyond U.S. territory. As such, the Circuit Court, State of Hawaii is not duly constituted to determine the issue of land in this case, whereby, has no subject matter jurisdiction and this case should be dismissed. Essentially, although the allegations of facts and evidence are undisputed, the Court’s granting of the Plaintiff’s partition and title deprive me of a fair and regular trial.

The War Crime Complaint also alleges: Although, a pro se Defendant,

 It is my belief, that, the evidence submitted by Dr. Keanu Sai, acting agent for the Hawaiian Kingdom, REFERRAL p.3, Annex 3, is evidence of (1) the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is unwilling to investigate and deliberately refuses to investigate these crimes and comply with the international laws of occupation and establish a military government, and (2) this victim relies on the evidence presented as the domestic remedies have not been exhausted on grounds that their application would be ineffective due to the prolonged illegal United States occupation of the Hawaiian Islands for 115 years.

Since I have no legal representation in this complaint, as a Hawaiian subject I consent to the legitimacy of the acting government to represent the Hawaiian State before international bodies.

Aloha Kanaina Ohana and attorneys. Notice is herein given in the case of, HOVEY B. LAMBERT vs. WAHA(K), et.al.Civil No.09-1-2529-10EEH, First Circuit, that I, Maltbie Napoleon, have filed, Defendant Maltbie K. Napoleon’s Memorandum in Opposition To Purchaser Patricia Chinn’s Motion for Entry of a Final Judgment as to the Kuleana Parcel, Pursuant to the Lili’uokalani Assignment and Restoration Agreement, Affidavit of Maltbie K. Napoleon Exhibit “A-D”, Certificate of Service, now available for viewing. Hearing set for July 11, 2013. As I cannot afford the expense and prevent prejudice my response(s) is allowed by Rule 5(b)(1)(c), I will submit original and copies for filing to the Circuit Court of the 1^st Circuit and deliver a copy to CADES SCHUTTE LLP, 1000 Bishop St. Suite 1200, Honolulu, HI 96813, for HOVEY B. LAMBERT, Trustee.

Mahalo e pomaikai.

At hearing on July 11, 2013, my opposition to Patricia Chinn’s Motion for Entry of a Final Judgment as to the Kuleana Parcel, Pursuant to the Lili’uokalani Assignment and Restoration Agreement was denied by Judge RHONDA A. NISHIMURA.

 On October 30, 2012, certified mail no. 7007 0710 0001 4974 5567, notice has been given to ADMIRAL SAMUEL J. LOCKLEAR III, USN, for violations of international law, PROTEST AND DEMAND, in the case of HOVEY B. LAMBERT, trustee under the Hovey B. Lambert Trust, an unrecorded Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated April 5, 2002, in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, Island of Oahu, Civil No. 09-1-2529-10 (Partition). Notice required by section 495(b), SECTION I—REMEDIES AND REPRISALS, CHAPTER 8—REMEDIES FOR VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW; DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL 27-10. I have been deprived of my right to a fair and regular trial by a court that does not have subject matter jurisdiction and stands in direct violation of the 1893 Lili‘uokalani  assignment & Agreement of restoration, 1907 Hague Convention, IV, the 1949 Geneva Convention, IV, and international law. An appropriate court with subject matter jurisdiction is an Article II Federal Court, which is a military court established by the President through executive order which would administer the civil and penal laws of the Hawaiian Kingdom under the international laws of occupation. However, Judge RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit would have jurisdiction if your office established a military government that utilizes the infrastructure of the State of Hawai‘i government to administer Hawaiian Kingdom law. Copies sent to BARRACK OBAMA, President, LEON PANETTA, Secretary of Defense and United Nations Security Council, Via DR. KEANU SAI, Chairman.

Mahalo e pomaikai.